Delhi HC rejects total smartphone ban in schools, issues guidelines

Source: Business Standard

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court refused to ban children from bringing smartphones to school. The Court clarified in its decision that the use of smartphones does not negatively impact teaching, discipline, or overall educational environment in the classroom. 

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani passed the directive during the hearing of a petition filed by a student seeking guidelines regarding the use of mobile phones in schools. The Court noted that its intent is to establish guiding principles to balance the positive and negative effects of allowing students to use smartphones while attending school. To read more please go to the following link:

https://www.business-standard.com/india-news/delhi-hc-rejects-total-smartphone-ban-in-schools-issues-guidelines-125030300395_1.html

High Court denies relief to Ll.B. student over attendance shortage

Source: Times of India

Students in professional degree courses must pursue their studies with all "seriousness and due diligence Delhi High Court has said, rejecting a student's plea to be permitted to appear in the LLB examination despite being short of the minimum attendance criterion. To read more please go to any of the following links:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/118584864.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Or

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/hc-denies-relief-to-llb-student-over-attendance-shortage/articleshow/118584864.cms

Can Courts Modify Arbitral Awards? Supreme Court Reserves Verdict

Source: NDTV

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on a key legal issue -- whether courts could modify arbitral awards under the provisions of a 1996 law on arbitration and conciliation. 

To read more please go to the following link:

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/supreme-court-reserves-verdict-on-whether-courts-can-modify-arbitral-awards-7746481

SC upholds doctors’ liability under Consumer Protection Act, rejects review plea

Source: Economic Times

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed doctors' accountability under the Consumer Protection Act 1986, dismissing a review petition against its 1995 ruling that doctors can be held liable for medical negligence. The court concluded that the existing judgment does not require reconsideration, maintaining that 'services' include medical consultation, diagnosis, and treatment. to read more please go to the following link:

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/sc-upholds-doctors-liability-under-consumer-protection-act-rejects-review-plea/articleshow/118393276.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst